Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify GitHub Actions webhooks limit #35448

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Clarify GitHub Actions webhooks limit #35448

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

alxch-
Copy link

@alxch- alxch- commented Nov 27, 2024

Why:

Closes: #35447

What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):

Check off the following:

  • A subject matter expert (SME) has reviewed the technical accuracy of the content in this PR. In most cases, the author can be the SME. Open source contributions may require a SME review from GitHub staff.
  • The changes in this PR meet the docs fundamentals that are required for all content.
  • All CI checks are passing.

@welcome Welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team label Nov 27, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Automatically generated comment ℹ️

This comment is automatically generated and will be overwritten every time changes are committed to this branch.

The table contains an overview of files in the content directory that have been changed in this pull request. It's provided to make it easy to review your changes on the staging site. Please note that changes to the data directory will not show up in this table.

Content directory changes

You may find it useful to copy this table into the pull request summary. There you can edit it to share links to important articles or changes and to give a high-level overview of how the changes in your pull request support the overall goals of the pull request.

Source Preview Production What Changed
actions/administering-github-actions/usage-limits-billing-and-administration.md fpt
ghec
ghes@ 3.15 3.14 3.13 3.12 3.11 3.10
fpt
ghec
ghes@ 3.15 3.14 3.13 3.12 3.11 3.10

fpt: Free, Pro, Team
ghec: GitHub Enterprise Cloud
ghes: GitHub Enterprise Server

@nguyenalex836 nguyenalex836 added content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team actions This issue or pull request should be reviewed by the docs actions team waiting for review Issue/PR is waiting for a writer's review and removed triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team labels Nov 27, 2024
@nguyenalex836
Copy link
Contributor

@alxch- Thanks so much for opening a PR! I'll get this triaged for review ✨

@subatoi subatoi added the needs SME This proposal needs review from a subject matter expert label Nov 28, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a pull request! We've triaged this issue for technical review by a subject matter expert 👀

@Zielony67

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view
@Zielony67

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view
@Ratchanon-Suttawas

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view
@Navvabk

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
actions This issue or pull request should be reviewed by the docs actions team content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team needs SME This proposal needs review from a subject matter expert waiting for review Issue/PR is waiting for a writer's review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GitHub Actions webhooks rate limiting is not clear
6 participants
@alxch- @nguyenalex836 @Zielony67 @Ratchanon-Suttawas @Navvabk @subatoi