Identify three-four model editors to integrate with for demonstration purposes #8
Description
Some candidates below.
| Tool | Pros | Risks |
|---|---|---|
| WebGME | web-based; prototypical inheritance; REST API; well-maintained; publication potential | technological heterogeneity (js) |
| MetaEdit+ | top industry-scale language workbench with strong academic ties | requires maturity from our framework before we can propose to work with them |
| Meriem's CD Editor | in-house; advanced recommendation mechanisms are being developed; allows demonstrating EMF integration | no support can be expected due to this being a one-man project |
| metaDepth or Melanee | bona-fide multi-level modeling frameworks; the MLM framework of metaDepth (possibly also Melanee?) follows the OCA principles which is complementary to lowkey's; publication potential | they bring their own MLM choices: this could necessitate revising many of our choices around the Physical metamodel; unclear if they are maintained |