Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we document the constructors? #63

Open
ssiccha opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Should we document the constructors? #63

ssiccha opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@ssiccha
Copy link
Collaborator

ssiccha commented Oct 7, 2021

Should we document the constructor functions like SUStabilizerOfIsotropicSubspace and SUStabilizerOfNonDegenerateSubspace which are used in C1SubgroupsSpecialUnitaryGroupGeneric?

I first thought that only making the Aschbacher classes available via the classes option of ClassicalMaximals could be enough, but as in the C1 class for Unitary groups above, there are different types in a single class. I'm not sure though, whether the work if worth the effort. On the other hand, it's a lot easier to write the docs now, then later. What do you think, @fingolfin?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant