Allow for code blocks to run on the playground

[gnikit]

It would be great if we could allow via a button for the examples that we provide in the Quickstart Tutorial to run in the playground.
I noticed the examples fall in 3 different categories:

1. Working examples, would compile and run as-is, no modification necessary.
2. Examples that need to be surrounded with program main/end program main or some other type of boilerplate code.
3. Examples that need to be appended together to make a Working Example e.g. https://fortran-lang.org/en/learn/quickstart/variables/#standard-input-output

Not every code block needs to be able to run in the playground but it would be cool if we could get users from reading to coding as quickly as possible.

[awvwgk]

I don't think this is possible in CSS or MyST-Markdown, but requires a custom sphinx extension. To make this practical we need a way to extract the code block from the docutils node, render it as code block and insert a link to run it on the playground (maybe in a header or like the copy button).

[henilp105]

This is a very good Example of it. https://zmoon.github.io/FortranTipBrowser/tips/006.html , currently using godbolt.

[henilp105]

@gnikit as also suggested by @awvwgk we would need a to extract all the codeblocks , then we would need a API ( to accept code in our format which is different from their current implementation) from playground to run code.

[gnikit]

@awvwgk The solution I was thinking was using Python. We would add some comment markers before the code blocks e.g.

<!--
"pg_use" : true,
"pg_pre" : "program main\n  implicit none\n",
"pg_post" : "end program main\n"
-->
```fortran
integer :: i
i = 10
print *, i
```

Here I used JSON since it's trivial to parse. Combine the above code with the codeblock and then communicate that with the playground (somehow). However, I don't know if the playground offers any API

[gnikit]

Basically, I think the extraction of the codeblocks is the easy part and there are plenty of solutions for that. Communicating the with the playground will probably be the hard bit here.

[henilp105]

@gnikit playground has its primary API to communicate with the compiler, ( its hosted at play-api.fortran-lang.org) , Just we would have to format our code to make it work with our implementation.

[gnikit]

Just we would have to format our code to make it work with our implementation.

Can you explain a bit what you mean by that?

[henilp105]

current playground API uses the following format ( {"code":"program hello\r\n ! This is a comment line; it is ignored by the compiler\r\n print *, 'Hello, World!'\r\nend program hello\r\n","programInput":"","libs":[]} ) , as you can see here the fortran code is slightly formatted with '\r' or '\n' and some other keywords by ace mostly, so we would have to change our existing code before sending via API.

[gnikit]

Thanks for the explanation. I don't see why we would have to change our docs. If we use a Python scripts, that extracts, packages and then sends the API request when pressing a button, the work for doing any post-processing on the code would fall on the Python script not the codeblock itself.

Anyway, I am not convinced that the carriage return character is even necessary for the API to work especially since the playground runs on a Linux server

[henilp105]

yes sir , but one of the things to consider would also be how to recieve the response of request via API , for that we would have to make playground just receive code and then the user could run it via the playground. They have opened an Issue for the same ( Please refer # 51 fortran-lang/playground#51 ) .

[henilp105]

@gnikit sir, I have added an API for the same , please refer Readme of the playground for integration information, would also open a PR for extracting code from docs.

Thanks and Regards,
Henil

[gnikit]

The issue should be closed when the integration to the website is done. Is there an existing pr or a commit doing that? If not how else is this going to be tracked if we close the issue?