::fragment:nth-child(1) should work?

[argyleink]

No description provided.

[flackr]

Do you expect this to select the first fragment? If so, I think we should add the parameter to the fragment function, e.g. ::fragment(1) or ::nth-fragment(1). The fragments are not proper "children" so I'm not sure if it's sensible to use nth-child here.

[argyleink]

yes, select the first fragment. not proper children.. but children nonetheless yeah?

what about ::fragment:snapped? view transitions precedence here might be useful to use for influence?