You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, wasm modules are stored in an Rc (as they are stored alongside host "modules), storing the instructions separately should bring a lot of speed improvements and maybe improve cache prefetching (?). The fastest way would be raw pointers, but I'd like to keep the codebase unsafe free.
Update: preliminary tests showed no tangible perf improvements from accessing instructions without indirection.
Update 2: bound-checking instructions adds around a 5% overehead in initial testing
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now, wasm modules are stored in an Rc (as they are stored alongside host "modules), storing the instructions separately should bring a lot of speed improvements and maybe improve cache prefetching (?). The fastest way would be raw pointers, but I'd like to keep the codebase unsafe free.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: