-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 151
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using a private ClojureScript build is unreasonably difficult #475
Comments
Global exclusions are applied only once, when the project is initialized: https://github.com/technomancy/leiningen/blob/afd3dee22aecf3e853409931e0557cad6be35ada/leiningen-core/src/leiningen/core/project.clj#L887 This means option (2) above is the most direct solution. |
Thank you for the detailed report! Regarding (2), just to clarify, we would only take the exclusions that have been specified for the cljsbuild plugin in the initial project.clj file. Or were you picturing something else? For example, given the following project.clj (defproject none "0.1.0-SNAPSHOT"
:description "FIXME: write this!"
:url "http://example.com/FIXME"
:dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure "1.8.0"]]
:plugins [[lein-cljsbuild "1.1.8-SNAPSHOT"]
:exclusions [org.clojure/clojurescript]]]
...) the subproject would contain the following dependency: {:dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure "1.8.0"]
[lein-cljsbuild "1.1.8-SNAPSHOT"]
:exclusions [org.clojure/clojurescript]]]
...} Regarding (3), I completely agree. People should define their own cljs version instead of relying on the one supplied through cljsbuild. |
But, if you're on board with dropping all of the automatic cljs dependency injection stuff altogether (i.e. option 3), then let's do that 😁 |
A variant of this issue: If you want to depend on ClojureScript as a Git Dep (by, for example, making use of |
That's exactly my situation. I think I'll try to fork the lein-cljsbuild and put in the coordinates of my own clojurescript fork and then I'll use the forked lein-cljsbuild... or have you found any better solution meanwhile? Thanks in advance. |
(…and it's at least partly my fault! :-|)
The typical way to use a private/fork build of a library in leiningen is to:
[org.clojars.cemerick/clojurescript "whatever"]
.:exclusions
inproject.clj
.This does not work for ClojureScript when using lein-cljsbuild, because the latter adds a
org.clojure/clojurescript
dependency if it doesn't find one in:dependencies
(via thecljsbuild
subproject). This puts two revs of CLJS on the classpath (the default dep being quite old at this point), thus guaranteeing a bad time. (Whether Leiningen should be applying the top-level exclusions to the subproject's dependencies before actually launching the new process is a worthwhile question I'll be investigating separately.)The only way to use a forked build of CLJS right now is to set up your own maven repository, to which you can deploy/host your private artifact using the
org.clojure/clojurescript
coordinates. (An example is here.) The top-level clojurescript dep then overrides cljsbuild's as always, it just happens to not be an authoritative build. This is a PITA.A couple ways forward:
:exclusions
not being applied to subproject dependencies is a bug, then we'll just wait for that to be fixed.:exclusions
and explicitly add them to thecljsbuild
dep that's mixed into the subproject.cljsbuild
shouldn't have a default CLJS dependency. Doing this was on my list back in the day, but that automatic dependency was very useful when CLJS "releases" were less well understood, harder to track, and so on. Things are much different now, and I don't know that the default dependency is doing anyone any favors (i.e. how many CLJS beginners are using a years-old build of the compiler?).This is just a placeholder for now. I'll return when I understand the
:exclusions
situation.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: