Replies: 1 comment
-
|
It's debatable whether this is a good idea. It reduces the amount of code that needs to be written but at the cost of the magic string conventions we deplore in other frameworks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Don't need a proliferation of single field types. Something like a horoscope is just a string. It should be returned from actions and injected into other actions.
This means:
RequireNameMatchannotationBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions