Replies: 6 comments 14 replies
-
It might be better/easier to ship a separate app for WYSIWYG text editing rather try and make Code be two different things. Its name was changed from Scratch to Code to emphasise that it was being developed as an IDE, not a general purposes text editor (in which case elementary currently lacks a native general purposes text editor). There is at least one 3rd party text editor designed for elementaryos - https://appcenter.elementary.io/com.github.lainsce.quilter/. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think that providing the option to at least open and read MS Office and Open office document formats would be a nice feature. Almost all consumers users need to deal with documents at least once, and elementaryOS doesn't provide one by default. Including the option to create Rich Text documents as well as Plain Text would also be useful for general users. I like how Apple's TextEdit for macOS works. It can display the text in open format documents as well as MS Office documents. It also has very basic spreadsheets and multi media features like creating simple tables and annotating images. A similar app for elementaryOS would complement the out of the box experience of elementaryOS. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think it unrealistic to hope that elementary devs can produce a MS Office/Libre Office compatible editor in the near future although it is nice goal. Probably an RTF editor would be the first step. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here is an example of TextEdit on macOS Leopard and Writer:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have some new ideas that may solve this issue:
@jeremypw What are your thoughts? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Btw, eds also has contacts support. So maybe a contacts app can also be provided. Where am I supposed to open issues for new app requests?? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I get that it's very much an IDE, but from my experience it is way too developer-y for normal people. So why is it in a consumer product as the one and only default text editor? Surely a development tool should not be installed by default.
The problem with a developer focused default app isn't just the defaults or the presentation either, it's the fact its for development; that it's basically cutting edge with its features.
If it isn't an IDE, then why is the text renderer specifically made for monospace fonts?
I feel that something more akin to TextEdit on mac would be more suitable, that can create and edit RTF files. Writer seems to be on the right tracks, and with some polishing and simplification it could easily be a default text editor for elementary OS.
Anyway despite having my gripes it's still my favourite IDE and I just want to start some discussion around making code more presentable as a product to the average person.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions