feat: Phase 6 - Update Command with Comprehensive Error Handling

[dwalleck]

Summary

Implements Phase 6 of Catalyst CLI: Update Command with comprehensive error handling improvements.

What's Included

Core Update Command Implementation:

• Version tracking with .catalyst-version file
• Hash-based skill modification detection
• Wrapper script updates with graceful degradation
• Detailed UpdateReport with success/error tracking

Comprehensive Error Handling (Priority 1 & 2 fixes):

• 3 new error variants with file path + source context
• TOCTOU race condition elimination
• Removal of unsafe unwrap() calls
• Version file write made fatal to prevent inconsistent state

Key Features

✅ Smart version comparison - skips unnecessary updates
✅ Preserves user customizations - skips modified skills
✅ Detailed reporting - shows updated/skipped/failed items
✅ Colored output - professional UX
✅ Error context - exact file paths in all errors
✅ TOCTOU-safe - no race conditions
✅ 12 new unit tests - 100% error path coverage

Files Modified

• catalyst-cli/src/types.rs - Added 3 contextual error variants
• catalyst-cli/src/init.rs - Version file functions + 5 tests
• catalyst-cli/src/update.rs - Complete update logic + 7 tests
• catalyst-cli/src/bin/catalyst.rs - CLI integration (previous commit)

Testing

✅ 48 total tests passing (including 12 new error handling tests)
✅ All error paths tested with context verification
✅ Unix-specific permission tests with proper cleanup
✅ Clippy clean - no warnings
✅ Formatted with cargo fmt

Error Handling Improvements

TOCTOU Races Fixed:

• read_version_file() - eliminated .exists() check
• update_skills() - eliminated .exists() check
• regenerate_hashes() - eliminated .exists() check

Error Context Added:

• All file reads include path context
• All file writes include path context
• All directory operations include path context

Unsafe Code Removed:

• copy_skill_files() - removed unwrap() on file_name()

Design Decisions:

• Version file write is FATAL (critical state)
• Wrapper/skill updates are graceful (continue on error)
• Full documentation of error recovery strategy

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[claude]

PR Review: Phase 6 - Update Command with Comprehensive Error Handling

Overall Assessment

✅ Excellent work! This PR demonstrates high-quality Rust code with comprehensive error handling, TOCTOU race elimination, and thorough test coverage. The implementation aligns well with the repository's Rust development best practices.

---

Strengths

1. Outstanding Error Handling 🌟

• ✅ Added 3 contextual error variants (FileReadFailed, FileWriteFailed, DirectoryCreationFailed) with file paths
• ✅ Eliminated all TOCTOU race conditions by removing .exists() checks before I/O operations
• ✅ Removed unsafe unwrap() calls from production code
• ✅ Clear error recovery strategy documentation

Example from read_version_file() (update.rs:138-148):

match fs::read_to_string(&version_path) {
    Ok(content) => Ok(Some(content.trim().to_string())),
    Err(e) if e.kind() == std::io::ErrorKind::NotFound => Ok(None),
    Err(e) => Err(CatalystError::FileReadFailed {
        path: version_path,
        source: e,
    }),
}

This correctly avoids TOCTOU by attempting the read directly rather than checking existence first.

2. Comprehensive Test Coverage ✅

• ✅ 12 new unit tests covering all error paths
• ✅ Unix-specific permission tests with proper cleanup
• ✅ Error context verification in tests
• ✅ Tests for missing files, permission errors, and success cases
• ✅ 48 total tests passing

3. Smart Design Decisions 💡

• ✅ Graceful degradation for wrapper script/skill updates - continues on error
• ✅ Fatal errors for version file writes - prevents inconsistent state
• ✅ Hash-based modification detection preserves user customizations
• ✅ Clear documentation of error recovery strategy

4. Production-Ready Code Quality

• ✅ Clippy clean
• ✅ Well-documented functions with comprehensive doc comments
• ✅ Implementation notes explaining design decisions (especially TOCTOU fixes)
• ✅ Professional UX with colored output and detailed reporting

---

Suggestions for Improvement

1. Consider Adding Integration Tests (Low Priority)

While unit tests are comprehensive, consider adding integration tests that verify the full update workflow:

#[test]
fn test_update_preserves_modified_skills() {
    // Setup: Initialize catalyst, modify a skill, run update
    // Expected: Modified skill is skipped, report shows it
}

#[test] 
fn test_update_with_force_overwrites_modified_skills() {
    // Setup: Initialize catalyst, modify a skill, run update --force
    // Expected: Modified skill is updated
}

Rationale: Integration tests would catch issues with the interaction between update(), update_skills(), and regenerate_hashes().

2. Performance Consideration: Hash Computation (Low Priority)

The update_skills() function computes hashes for every installed skill. For projects with many skills, consider:

// Current: Sequential hash computation
for (skill_name, expected_hash) in &stored_hashes.skills {
    let current_hash = compute_file_hash(&skill_path)?;
    // ...
}

// Potential optimization: Parallel hash computation (future enhancement)
use rayon::prelude::*;
let results: Vec<_> = stored_hashes.skills
    .par_iter()
    .map(|(name, hash)| (name, compute_file_hash(&skill_path)))
    .collect();

Note: This is likely premature optimization for current use case, but worth considering if skills scale significantly.

3. Minor: Consistent Error Message Formatting (Nitpick)

In update.rs:54, the error message could be more specific:

// Current
"No .catalyst-version file found. This directory may not be initialized. Try 'catalyst init' first."

// Suggestion: Include the directory path
format\!(
    "No .catalyst-version file found in {}. This directory may not be initialized. Try 'catalyst init' first.",
    target_dir.display()
)

Benefit: Helps users debug when they're in the wrong directory.

---

Security Considerations

✅ No security concerns identified

• Path traversal prevention: Uses .join() for path operations (safe)
• No user input directly used in file paths without validation
• File operations properly handle permissions errors
• No SQL injection risks (no database operations)

---

Code Quality Checklist (Based on Rust Developer Guidelines)

Check	Status	Notes
✅ No redundant single-component imports	✅ Pass	All imports are specific items
✅ No bare .unwrap() in production code	✅ Pass	Only used in tests, removed from copy_skill_files()
✅ Option types handled safely	✅ Pass	Uses if let, match, ok_or_else()
✅ Path operations handle None	✅ Pass	file_name() in copy_skill_files() properly handled
✅ TOCTOU races eliminated	✅ Pass	No .exists() before I/O
✅ Errors include file paths	✅ Pass	All new error variants include paths
✅ Tests cover error paths	✅ Pass	12 new error handling tests
✅ Proper error propagation	✅ Pass	Uses ? operator appropriately

---

Documentation Quality

Excellent Documentation Examples:

1. update.rs:23-38 - Error Recovery Strategy clearly documented
2. init.rs:905-913 - write_version_file() with clear purpose
3. update.rs:135-140 - TOCTOU implementation note

Function Documentation Completeness:

• ✅ All public functions have doc comments
• ✅ Arguments and return values documented
• ✅ Error cases documented
• ✅ Implementation notes where needed

---

Test Coverage Analysis

Excellent Test Coverage:

• ✅ Happy path: test_read_version_file_success, test_write_version_file_success
• ✅ Not found: test_read_version_file_not_found, test_compute_file_hash_not_found
• ✅ Permissions: Unix-specific permission tests with cleanup
• ✅ Error context: Verifies file paths in error variants
• ✅ Edge cases: Missing skill files, unreadable hash files

Test Cleanup Pattern:

The Unix permission tests correctly restore permissions:

fs::set_permissions(&version_path, fs::Permissions::from_mode(0o644)).unwrap();

This prevents tempdir cleanup issues. Well done!

---

Potential Edge Cases

1. Concurrent Updates (Low Risk)

Scenario: Two catalyst update processes running simultaneously

Current behavior: Both would read, update, and write - last one wins

Impact: Low - unlikely in practice, worst case is redundant work

Suggestion (future): Consider file locking if this becomes an issue

2. Partial Skill Updates (Handled)

Scenario: Skill update fails mid-copy

Current behavior: Reports error, continues with other skills ✅

Impact: Low - graceful degradation works well

---

Performance Characteristics

Based on the implementation:

• File I/O: Linear with number of skills (acceptable)
• Hash computation: SHA256 on skill files (~1-50KB typically) - fast
• Memory: Loads entire files for hashing - fine for expected file sizes
• Network: None ✅

Verdict: Performance should be excellent for expected workloads.

---

Alignment with Repository Goals

This PR aligns perfectly with the Catalyst project's focus on:

1. ✅ Production-ready code - Comprehensive error handling
2. ✅ User experience - Clear reporting, colored output
3. ✅ Safety - TOCTOU elimination, no unwraps
4. ✅ Maintainability - Well-documented, tested
5. ✅ Zero-dependency runtime - Uses only std/core/SHA256

---

Recommendation

✅ APPROVE - Ready to Merge

This PR represents high-quality Rust development with:

• Comprehensive error handling and TOCTOU fixes
• Excellent test coverage (12 new tests, all passing)
• Clear documentation and design rationale
• Graceful error recovery strategy
• No security concerns

The suggestions above are minor enhancements for future consideration, not blockers.

---

Summary Statistics

• Files changed: 5
• Lines added: 706
• Lines removed: 5
• New tests: 12
• Total tests: 48 (all passing)
• New error variants: 3
• TOCTOU races fixed: 3
• Unsafe unwraps removed: 1+

Great work on Phase 6! 🎉

[claude]

Code Review: Phase 6 - Update Command with Comprehensive Error Handling

Summary

Excellent implementation! This PR successfully delivers Phase 6 of the Catalyst CLI with thoughtful error handling, TOCTOU race elimination, and comprehensive test coverage. The code demonstrates strong Rust practices and careful attention to edge cases.

✅ Strengths

1. Outstanding Error Handling

• Contextual errors: All three new error variants (FileReadFailed, FileWriteFailed, DirectoryCreationFailed) include both file paths and source errors, making debugging trivial
• TOCTOU elimination: Properly eliminates Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use races by attempting operations directly rather than checking existence first
  • read_version_file() (update.rs:138-150)
  • update_skills() (update.rs:120-132)
  • regenerate_hashes() (update.rs:262-273)
• Clear documentation: Each TOCTOU fix is documented with implementation notes explaining the approach

2. Robust Error Recovery Strategy

• Graceful degradation: Wrapper script and skill updates continue on error, reporting issues without failing the entire operation
• Critical failure handling: Version file write is correctly marked as FATAL with clear reasoning documented (update.rs:42-48)
• No unsafe unwrap() calls in production code: All unwrap() calls are confined to test code only ✅

3. Excellent Test Coverage

• 12 new tests covering all error paths
• Platform-specific tests: Unix permission tests properly guarded with #[cfg(unix)]
• Proper cleanup: Tests restore permissions to allow tempdir deletion
• Error context verification: Tests verify both error type AND path context

4. Professional UX

• Colored output: Clean, intuitive status reporting
• Detailed reporting: Users see exactly what was updated, skipped, and why
• Clear guidance: Suggests --force flag when skills are skipped

5. Smart Version Management

• Hash-based modification detection: Preserves user customizations intelligently
• Efficient updates: Skips unnecessary work when already up-to-date
• Version tracking: .catalyst-version file enables proper state management

🔍 Code Quality Observations

Minor Suggestions (Non-blocking)

1. Test file line 389 (update.rs:389):

   assert!(hash_file.exists());

   This is the only .exists() check in the file, and it's in test code verifying a successful write. This is acceptable, but for consistency with the TOCTOU-elimination philosophy, you could read the file and verify its contents instead:

   let content = fs::read_to_string(&hash_file).unwrap();
   let hashes: CatalystHashes = serde_json::from_str(&content).unwrap();
   assert_eq!(hashes.version, CATALYST_VERSION);

   Decision: Not critical - test code has different requirements. The current approach is fine.

2. Duplicate error handling pattern (update.rs:143-148 and update.rs:266-271):
   The pattern for handling NotFound vs other errors appears twice. Consider extracting to a helper if this pattern grows:

   fn read_json_file<T: DeserializeOwned>(path: &Path) -> Result<Option<T>> {
       match fs::read_to_string(path) {
           Ok(content) => Ok(Some(serde_json::from_str(&content)?)),
           Err(e) if e.kind() == std::io::ErrorKind::NotFound => Ok(None),
           Err(e) => Err(CatalystError::FileReadFailed { ... })
       }
   }

   Decision: Not necessary at this stage - only 2 occurrences and they have slightly different return types.

🚀 Performance Considerations

• SHA256 hashing: Efficient for modification detection, appropriate algorithm choice
• Graceful degradation: Continues processing other skills/hooks even when one fails, maximizing update effectiveness
• Early exit: Smart version comparison skips entire update when already current

🔒 Security Considerations

• Path validation: copy_skill_files() properly validates subdirectory paths (update.rs:226-231)
• No path traversal vulnerabilities: Uses proper PathBuf APIs
• Permission handling: Tests demonstrate awareness of permission issues

📊 Test Coverage Assessment

Excellent coverage of:

• ✅ Success paths
• ✅ NotFound errors
• ✅ Permission errors (Unix-specific)
• ✅ Error context propagation
• ✅ Missing hash files
• ✅ Missing skill files

Potential additional tests (nice-to-have, not required):

• Concurrent update attempts (lock file testing)
• Large file handling
• Symbolic link handling (if supported)
• Force flag behavior with modified skills

🎯 Architectural Decisions

Excellent Choices:

1. Fatal version file write: Correct decision with clear documentation. Prevents inconsistent state.

2. Hash-based detection over timestamps: More reliable, platform-independent approach.

3. Graceful skill updates: Allows partial success, maximizing value to users even when some updates fail.

4. Embedded resources: include_dir! ensures consistent source of truth.

📝 Documentation Quality

• Inline documentation: Comprehensive rustdoc comments
• Implementation notes: Critical design decisions documented (TOCTOU, error recovery)
• PR description: Excellent summary of changes and rationale

🐛 Bugs or Issues

None found. The code is solid.

🎨 Best Practices Adherence

• ✅ Proper use of thiserror for error handling
• ✅ No unwrap() in production code
• ✅ Platform-specific code properly guarded
• ✅ Tests include cleanup for side effects
• ✅ Clear separation of concerns (init vs update logic)
• ✅ Follows Rust API guidelines for error types

📋 Integration Notes

This PR integrates cleanly with:

• ✅ CLI binary (catalyst.rs) - proper report display
• ✅ Init module - reuses version file functions
• ✅ Types module - new error variants fit naturally
• ✅ Test infrastructure - 48 total passing tests

Final Recommendation

✅ APPROVE - This PR is ready to merge.

The implementation demonstrates exceptional attention to detail, particularly around error handling and race condition elimination. The code is production-ready, well-tested, and well-documented.

Before Merge Checklist:

• ✅ All tests passing (48/48)
• ✅ Clippy clean
• ✅ Formatted with cargo fmt
• ✅ Documentation complete
• ✅ Error handling comprehensive
• ✅ No security concerns
• ✅ No performance regressions

Outstanding work! This sets a high bar for future phases.

---

Review generated with assistance from Claude Code 🤖