From 306e76559759d8b0d003ff09fec325d597b0149b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:31:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove normative part from example.
This part contains a normative statement into an example. In RFC2119
`SHOULD` means `RECOMMENDED` while iiuc it's not a bad practice
to return warnings in a non-2xx response.
---
http-warning/draft-cedik-http-warning-02.xml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/http-warning/draft-cedik-http-warning-02.xml b/http-warning/draft-cedik-http-warning-02.xml
index 6485a4a..352dec5 100644
--- a/http-warning/draft-cedik-http-warning-02.xml
+++ b/http-warning/draft-cedik-http-warning-02.xml
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ Content-Warning: "embedded-warning"; 1590190500
</section>
<section anchor="example" title="Example with HTTP Header Field and Embedded Warning">
<t>
- Since warnings do not have an effect on the returned HTTP status code, the response status code SHOULD be in the 2xx range, indicating that the intent of the client was successful.
+ Since warnings do not have an effect on the returned HTTP status code, the response status code will usually be in the 2xx range, indicating that the intent of the client was successful.
</t>
<figure><artwork><![CDATA[
POST /example HTTP/1.1