-
I want to package sftpgo into docker images.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Please read our compliance page. The only unanswered question is about Portainer, but of course the SFTPGo license does not change the Portainer license. You asked for many things, from personal use to reselling SFTPGo as SaaS (which you obviously can't do), so what I'll write below is not necessarily aimed at you. Leaving aside the legal standpoint, let's consider it from a social point of view. Do you think that as the author of SFTPGo, a project I've been working on since 2019 many hours a day, I could be happy to see companies basing their business on my software free riding on my generosity? How would you feel in my place? What will you do if one of your users asks for support and you are unable to provide it? You will likely open an issue on GitHub tryng to free riding on my generosity once again and that's exactly why I no longer answer anyone on GitHub, clearly this also penalizes users who use SFTPGo without violating its license and/or trademark and I'm very sorry for this. If you want to offer your customers a file transfer solution, you should write your own and acquire the technical expertise to support it properly, not repackage an open source software. I'm sorry if the SFTPGo trademark and license are a "problem" for you: they are there to protect my software and my work. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
if i package it with License AGPL V3? and keep the project codes with open source. So what is the problem? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
The problem is selling freely usable software under your own name. The solution would be simple: a contract with the author and the author's participation in the sale.