Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support running optional lite and full source-build pipelines in SDK PR Checks #4779

Open
ellahathaway opened this issue Dec 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
area-testing Improvements in CI and testing

Comments

@ellahathaway
Copy link
Member

In SDK PR checks, we have the following VMR pipelines:

  • sdk-unified-build
  • sdk-unified-build-full
  • sdk-source-build

Both sdk-unified-build and sdk-soure-build run as required pipeline checks for SDK PRs, while sdk-unified-build-full is an optional check that can be triggered via the azp run command.

Source-build should consider following the approach used by the unified build pipelines. Specifically, we should consider adding optional public pipelines called sdk-source-build-lite and sdk-source-build-full that run either the source-build lite legs or the full source-build legs, respectively.

Copy link

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this issue. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

Copy link

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this issue. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@MichaelSimons MichaelSimons added area-testing Improvements in CI and testing and removed untriaged labels Dec 5, 2024
@MichaelSimons MichaelSimons moved this from Backlog to 10.0 in .NET Source Build Dec 5, 2024
@MichaelSimons
Copy link
Member

[Triage] This will require creating a new pipeline(s). Once SB is migrated into the VMR, this will be trivial to support.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-testing Improvements in CI and testing
Projects
Status: 10.0
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants