Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Thanks for reaching out and sharing your progress—your current work is really impressive, and it’s great to see you’ve already formed a clear design around the local obstacle avoidance task. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,dora-rs team!
I am interested in the "Local Obstacle Avoidance for Dora Robots" GSoC project idea and wanted to share what I've built so far and get your feedback before finalizing my proposal.
Objective: To develop a local planner operator for the Dora framework that enables real-time obstacle avoidance and smooth navigation in a 2D simulated environment.
Core Logic Selection: Comparison between Dynamic Window Approach (DWA) and Artificial Potential Field (APF) for implementation.
Key Questions for Clarification:
● What is the specific format of the obstacle input data (raw sensor vs. processed clusters)?
● Are we prioritizing computational speed (APF) or trajectory optimality (DWA)?
● How is the local goal generated (global planner integration vs. static input)?
● What are the exact motion constraints of the simulated robot (differential vs. omnidirectional)?
● Is real-time graphical visualization of the trajectory required for the demo?
For this project, I have implemented a simple DWA-based local planner and integrated it into the dora_nav open-source project. The results are as follows:
Demo Video:https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1z3XoBdEWA/?vd_source=5103ee22355f0209eaf90b2304ac2fb9
Looking forward to your feedback!
Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions