You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
About the name, considering there is another project with a very similar name, the difference being letter case and a missing dot - Qt.py versus qtpy - do you think it would make sense to call this project Qt.py Convert, or the like? Granted Qt.py is a tricky name to add suffixes too..
Some ideas.
Qt.conv
Qt.all
Qt.pyconvert
ConvertQt.py
convert.Qt.py
QtConvert.py
convert-to-Qt.py
Not confident either of these are better, just thought I'd bring it up for discussion before any official announcements of the project (at which point it'd be a shame to change it!)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Talked to the team, we see the value in being more specific in the project name, however we are mentioning both in the description and in the top of the readme that it is for Qt.py so I don't think it'll be too big of a deal?
Plus personally I feel that adding a dot makes it pretty unwieldy pretty quick.
I can add a disclaimer noting that it is not the spyder project if you think it's necessary.
Hey @Ahuge,
About the name, considering there is another project with a very similar name, the difference being letter case and a missing dot - Qt.py versus qtpy - do you think it would make sense to call this project
Qt.py Convert
, or the like? Granted Qt.py is a tricky name to add suffixes too..Some ideas.
Not confident either of these are better, just thought I'd bring it up for discussion before any official announcements of the project (at which point it'd be a shame to change it!)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: