-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rerolls #213
Comments
I think that some of what you're after is already possible: Re-roll and drop the original:You can use the re-roll modifier for this. This will only keep the last re-rolled value, and has a flag to tell it to only re-roll once; From the docs:
Re-roll and add to originalUnless I'm misunderstanding, I think this can be achieved with the exploding modifier. It will re-roll, but also retain the previous rolls as well. You can also compound the rolls into a single value if necessary. From the docs:
Re-roll twice and pick higherI'm not entirely certain what you need here. Are you wanting it so that you roll a die (Let's say a There is the keep modifier, which may do some of what you're after, in combination with the exploding modifier, but I'm not certain. Because the explode modifier runs before the drop modifier, you could do something like:
But this doesn't limit the amount of times the die will explode, so it could do so more than 2 times. If you're just wanting to roll 3 of the same die and keep the highest, you can do:
|
Oh, thanks, I must have missed the existence of the re-roll modifier when reading through examples. |
No worries, there's a lot there! Let me know if it isn't what you're expecting. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I can't find a way to request a reroll.
Describe the solution you'd like
a reroll modifier. This would, incidentally, allow solving #205 because people would be able to combine that modifier with any logic they want, i.e. reroll and drop the original, reroll and add to original, reroll twice and pick higher (known as advantage) etc. etc.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Some kind of arcane trickery with ifs and requesting 2d6-1d6?
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: