You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In many cases, properties are not unique to a single class, i.e. no rdfs:domain is specified. There might however be a necessary condition ( rdfs:subClassOf [ rdf:type owl:Restriction...]), e.g. myProperty min 1 which would be nice to see in the auto generated documentation. Since these are not listed, I feel that important parts of the ontology are left out.
Describe the solution you'd like
If there are rdfs:subClassOf statements that refers to nodes that are owl:Restriction, these statements could be listed in the has super-classes block in the Classes documentation. Best/clearest would be to use Manchester syntax, e.g. myProperty min 1.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Maybe list rdfs:subClassOf [ rdf:type owl:Restriction...] in a separate block?
Additional context
Example from Protege where only "Feature" currently will be listed under has super-classes.
Protege:
WIDOCO:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In many cases, properties are not unique to a single class, i.e. no rdfs:domain is specified. There might however be a necessary condition (
rdfs:subClassOf [ rdf:type owl:Restriction...]
), e.g.myProperty min 1
which would be nice to see in the auto generated documentation. Since these are not listed, I feel that important parts of the ontology are left out.Describe the solution you'd like
If there are rdfs:subClassOf statements that refers to nodes that are owl:Restriction, these statements could be listed in the has super-classes block in the Classes documentation. Best/clearest would be to use Manchester syntax, e.g.
myProperty min 1
.Describe alternatives you've considered
Maybe list
rdfs:subClassOf [ rdf:type owl:Restriction...]
in a separate block?Additional context
Example from Protege where only "Feature" currently will be listed under has super-classes.
Protege:
WIDOCO:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: