Skip to content

Actor client SDK requires actor implementation #417

Description

@danielgerlag

It seems the to use the JS SDK for actors, the client invoking a remote actor needs a copy of the implementation code in order to register the actor... drilling into the code, it looks like the only reason for this is to get the name of the actor type. Would it be possible to have an overload to create the proxy builder that does not require passing in the implementation, but rather just the actor type name?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions