adversarial-plan-review-codex red-teams a plan before execution. It is a companion skill for deep-planning-codex, and it can also be used directly when a plan needs hostile review for stale assumptions, missing validation, rollback gaps, sequencing errors, stakeholder risks, or unsafe execution.
- Reads the plan, criteria, evidence catalog, assumptions, dead ends, probes, and verification plan.
- Selects software, business, or mixed review lenses.
- Checks evidence, order of operations, validation relevance, rollback, permissions, and stakeholder/data risks.
- Classifies findings as
BLOCKING,IMPORTANT, orNOTE. - Returns
PASS,FAIL, orPARTIAL.
This folder is a Codex-native derivative of:
- Source gist:
https://gist.github.com/dachent/cdc05151d047708c290bd4da0aaeed96 - Source file:
deep_planning.txt - Source revision:
6ea4c02e5aa60c9991e1e4d1c50089c01cd6ec83 - Source phases adapted: Phase 3 grilling, Phase 6 UltraPlan review, and Phase 7 execution-plan validation
- Source type: user-authored Claude-native deep planning prompt template
- Port depth: new Codex-native companion skill
The source gist relies on Claude-native grilling and planning commands to challenge assumptions. The Codex version makes that challenge explicit as a reusable review skill with severity labels, pass/fail criteria, and write scope.
The conversion is Codex-native because it works without Claude slash commands, does not assume subagents are available, and can review code plans, no-Git work, business artifacts, and mixed workflows using the same artifact contract.
SKILL.md: active Codex skill instructions.agents/openai.yaml: Codex app display metadata and default prompt.references/: software, business, and mixed review lenses.
Validation before publication covered metadata checks, static forbidden-token scans, and live subagent forward testing on a deliberately flawed plan. The live run returned FAIL with blocking findings before execution.