You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your excellent work! But I have a problem about the graph symmetry. The article says the dependency patterns between sensors need not be symmetric. However, in the case without prior information, the candidate relation graph is fully-connected, and the similarity matrix is symmetric, while the topk operation does not change its symmetry. Does it mean the learned adjacency matrix A is symmetric? Thank you for your answering!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While the similarity matrix is symmetric, applying the top-k operation directly on this matrix does not necessarily result in a symmetric adjacency matrix, as the top-k operation is selecting top-k elements in each row independently, you might include $S_{ij}$ in row i but not $S_{ji}$ in row j as the top-k neighbors in row i and j could be different ($S$ is a symmetric matrix).
Thank you for your excellent work! But I have a problem about the graph symmetry. The article says the dependency patterns between sensors need not be symmetric. However, in the case without prior information, the candidate relation graph is fully-connected, and the similarity matrix is symmetric, while the topk operation does not change its symmetry. Does it mean the learned adjacency matrix A is symmetric? Thank you for your answering!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: