Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

problem about the graph symmetry #103

Open
InvincibleWza1999 opened this issue Sep 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

problem about the graph symmetry #103

InvincibleWza1999 opened this issue Sep 28, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@InvincibleWza1999
Copy link

Thank you for your excellent work! But I have a problem about the graph symmetry. The article says the dependency patterns between sensors need not be symmetric. However, in the case without prior information, the candidate relation graph is fully-connected, and the similarity matrix is symmetric, while the topk operation does not change its symmetry. Does it mean the learned adjacency matrix A is symmetric? Thank you for your answering!

@d-ailin
Copy link
Owner

d-ailin commented Sep 29, 2024

Hi, thanks for your interest!

While the similarity matrix is symmetric, applying the top-k operation directly on this matrix does not necessarily result in a symmetric adjacency matrix, as the top-k operation is selecting top-k elements in each row independently, you might include $S_{ij}$ in row i but not $S_{ji}$ in row j as the top-k neighbors in row i and j could be different ($S$ is a symmetric matrix).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants