Skip to content

Investigate better UI from single time step -> two time steps -> more than two time steps #24

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
nikmolnar opened this issue May 22, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@nikmolnar
Copy link
Contributor

From @brendan-ward:

I know we discussed this at length, but I'm finding the interaction somewhat unintuitive:

  1. select species - it shows up in green. (great!)
  2. select a future projection - new colors red and blue show up, which will make a whole lot more sense once we have a legend.
  3. turn on an additional timestep - new colors go away and now there is much less green. Wait - what??

I think the problem is that we are really allowing 2 separate routes through the same UI elements:

  • compare 2 timesteps and show: gained, same, loss
  • compare multiple timesteps and show only the pixels that stay the same under all.

Should we approach these 2 routes differently from a workflow perspective? If we did so, we could make the UI and associated changes on the map more intuitive. E.g., if I am comparing 2 timesteps, then the futures should be presented as radio buttons or even a dropdown (probably better): I can only pick one future to compare to, and then it is really clear that I can look at gain, same, loss

Then if I want to see what remains the same under multiple timesteps, I can choose that route, and choose all the timesteps that I want to intersect together.

@nikmolnar nikmolnar self-assigned this May 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant