Adding codebook-lsp

[VasanthakumarV]

Checklist

• Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
• License file is packaged (see here for an example).
• Source is from official source.
• Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
• If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
• Package does not ship static libraries. If static libraries are needed, follow CFEP-18.
• Build number is 0.
• A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
• GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
• When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

[github-actions]

Hi! This is the staged-recipes linter and your PR looks excellent! 🚀

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/codebook-lsp/recipe.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/codebook-lsp/recipe.yaml:

• ❌ The recipe could do with some maintainers listed in the extra/recipe-maintainers section.

_{This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/18533731810. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.}

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/codebook-lsp/recipe.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[VasanthakumarV]

@conda-forge/help-rust, ready for review

[baszalmstra]

Please use cargo-auditable.

I suggest you look at https://conda-forge.org/docs/maintainer/example_recipes/rust/

[VasanthakumarV]

@conda-forge/help-rust PR ready for merge

[danielnachun]

Two very small changes needed here and then this should be ready to go.

[VasanthakumarV]

Hi @danielnachun, Thanks for the review, please do let me know if further changes are required.