OSS Fuzzing #578
Replies: 3 comments 5 replies
-
@ennamarie19 According to the new projects' page , this is required for access:
Would it be alright with you if you manage our access or is there a way that we can create Pull Requests to add ourselves? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Your access to those links should start working in the next several days. it took a while for me to be let in as well. I believe that the 90 day timeframe is an OSS-Fuzz policy. I do not think that can be changed to immediately disclose reports.Feel free to check into this once you get access though! On Nov 8, 2023, at 4:41 AM, Nicco Kunzmann ***@***.***> wrote:
@ennamarie19 This is an email that I received:
Labels: Restrict-View-Commit ClusterFuzz Stability-LibFuzzer Reproducible Engine-libfuzzer OS-Linux Proj-icalendar Reported-2023-11-07
Type: Bug
New issue 63959 by ClusterFuzz-External: icalendar:ical_fuzzer: Uncaught exception in init
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=63959
Detailed Report: https://oss-fuzz.com/testcase?key=6484029419159552
Project: icalendar
Fuzzing Engine: libFuzzer
Fuzz Target: ical_fuzzer
Job Type: libfuzzer_ubsan_icalendar
Platform Id: linux
Crash Type: Uncaught exception
Crash Address:
Crash State:
init
from_ical
Sanitizer: undefined (UBSAN)
Regressed: https://oss-fuzz.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_ubsan_icalendar&range=202311060615:202311070621
Reproducer Testcase: https://oss-fuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6484029419159552
Issue filed automatically.
See https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/advanced-topics/reproducing for instructions to reproduce this bug locally.
When you fix this bug, please
mention the fix revision(s).
state whether the bug was a short-lived regression or an old bug in any stable releases.
add any other useful information.
This information can help downstream consumers.
If you need to contact the OSS-Fuzz team with a question, concern, or any other feedback, please file an issue at https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues. Comments on individual Monorail issues are not monitored.
This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. If 90 days elapse
without an upstream patch, then the bug report will automatically
become visible to the public.
--
You received this message because:
You were specifically CC'd on the issue
When I access the links: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=63959 and https://oss-fuzz.com/testcase?key=6484029419159552, I get an Access Denied
This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. If 90 days elapse
without an upstream patch, then the bug report will automatically
become visible to the public.
I think that since this is a public project and the reports (12 already) might create lot's of new little issues for people to solve, it might be good to make them public instantly. We do not have a security policy when it comes to potentially exploitable code but I also think that we might not have such an issue in the normal case. From my perspective, the normal case should be easy access to the information and an easy way to start fixing the issues.
So the question is: Can you add me somehow to these projects so I can change settings or is it possible to instantly disclose the reports? Then, I can have a look at them and create new small issues to solve.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@ennamarie19, I would value to add some information for maintainers about the OSS Fuzzing here: https://icalendar.readthedocs.io/en/latest/maintenance.html#new-releases |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@ennamarie19 has added fuzzing to our automated tests (GitHub Actions) on Pull Requests (#562).
Some background on OSS FUZZ:
The first PR seemed quite promising when it comes to detecting edge case errors: #577
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions