Hash value ommission from Ruby-3.1

[fonji]

Hash value omission was introduced with ruby 3.1 - rubyreferences.github.io/rubychanges/3.1.html#values-in-hash-literals-and-keyword-arguments-can-be-omitted

And apparently it breaks flog:

ERROR: parsing ruby file example.rb
Racc::ParseError: example.rb:5 :: parse error on value "," (tCOMMA) at:
  /usr/local/lib/ruby/2.6.0/racc/parser.rb:528:in `on_error'
  /usr/local/bundle/gems/ruby_parser-3.13.1/lib/ruby_parser_extras.rb:1179:in `on_error'
  /usr/local/lib/ruby/2.6.0/racc/parser.rb:259:in `_racc_do_parse_c'
  /usr/local/lib/ruby/2.6.0/racc/parser.rb:259:in `do_parse'
  /usr/local/bundle/gems/ruby_parser-3.13.1/lib/ruby_parser_extras.rb:1086:in `block in process'

example.rb content:

# frozen_string_literal: true

class Example
  def perform(id)
    Model.find_by!(id:, something: :else)
  end
end

This is also happens to the duplication engine (codeclimate/codeclimate-duplication#375)

Thanks

[fonji]

Updating ruby_parser may do the trick
https://github.com/seattlerb/ruby_parser/blob/master/History.rdoc

[mlinderman]

Thanks @fonji! The Quality team at Code Climate is making a concerted effort to upgrade all plug-ins, since some have been neglected for a while. I'll bump up codeclimate-flog's priority. Please keep in touch with our changelog for updates.

[fonji]

Thanks @mlinderman, I'm glad to hear that! 😃

[dantevvp]

Hey @fonji ! A new version of codeclimate-flog is now up to support the latest ruby_parser version. Thanks for your contribution!

[fonji]

That's awesome! Thanks @dantevvp ❤️

[fonji]

Thanks for the shoutout in the changelog! 💕
I set up the channel as channel: flog-4-6-6, but I still have problems with hash value ommissions.
Did I miss something?

[dantevvp]

Hey @fonji !

Are you having issues when using the CLI? Or is it when analysing PRs on Github? If it's the latter, there might have been a delay in the update. Try running your analyses again and if any other issues arise let me know!

[fonji]

Oh you're right! It was when analysing PRs on Github, I pushed again just now and got my issues back.
Sorry for the false positive, and thank you once again!