You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Discovered in #431, if you try to extrapolate quantiles for predictions which have been thresholded, you can get quantiles outside of those thresholds. For example, if you have a quantile level of .1 which has value 0, then .05 will be negative, even if the quantile is negative.
Ways I can think to deal with this:
include the support in the distribution, probably as an interval, e.g. c(0,Inf), and use that in quantile_extrapolate. Unsure if the types will play nicely with this one.
Add limit options to get passed to quantile_extrapolate. Seems like it will require the user to know that they have thresholds, whereas the first option will build it into the result as part of layer_threshold.
Just let it be and let the user figure it out by mentally thresholding. Seems not ideal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Discovered in #431, if you try to extrapolate quantiles for predictions which have been thresholded, you can get quantiles outside of those thresholds. For example, if you have a quantile level of
.1
which has value0
, then.05
will be negative, even if the quantile is negative.Ways I can think to deal with this:
c(0,Inf)
, and use that inquantile_extrapolate
. Unsure if the types will play nicely with this one.quantile_extrapolate
. Seems like it will require the user to know that they have thresholds, whereas the first option will build it into the result as part oflayer_threshold
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: