Skip to content

Adding support for direct byte-buffers #41

@luxbock

Description

@luxbock

I really like the synergy between byte-streams and gloss, so I found it a bit odd that while byte-streams supports converting to a DirectByteBuffer via the options map, there doesn't seem to be way for gloss to create DirectByteBuffers from its codecs. Perhaps encode could accept an optional option map similar to how byte-streams/convert does?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions