Question: How well does an open source community attend to welcoming newcomers?
This metric evaluates how effectively an open source community creates a welcoming environment for new members. It encompasses aspects of onboarding, orientation, and ongoing support, allowing projects to measure and understand their approach to newcomer experience.
By analyzing the newcomer experience, projects can:
- Identify strengths and weaknesses in their welcoming processes
- Foster a more inclusive and engaging community for all members.
- Assess how community design enhances the newcomer experience.
- Evaluate the effectiveness of documentation in aiding new contributors.
- Recognize and support new community members.
- Identify available resources for newcomers.
- Highlight areas for improvement in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) issues affecting newcomers.
Click to read more about this metric.
- Track subsequent contributions from first-time contributors to assess engagement.
- Monitor New Contributors Closing Issues to evaluate new contributor activity.
- Conduct surveys that include newcomer experience questions, such as:
- Likert scale items (1-x):
- I feel welcome in the community.
- I feel like I am making a contribution to the community.
- I am satisfied with the current community structure.
- I would like to help more in the community.
- I have the ability to have an impact in the community.
- The community treats new members well.
- Open-ended questions, such as:
- What does the community lack that you wish it didn’t (e.g., more in-person events, DEI research)?
- What obstacles did you encounter when starting with the community (e.g., difficulty finding information, meeting times)?
- Likert scale items (1-x):
- Evaluate the effectiveness of:
- Mentorship programs aimed at newcomers.
- Newcomer onboarding training.
- Peer-to-peer mentorship within the community.
- Project Documentation via related metrics:
The newcomer experience can be filtered by:
- Member Demographics
- Types of Contributions
- Amount of prior open source experience.
- Time between a newcomer’s first and subsequent engagements.
- New contributors
- Occasional contributors
- Inactive contributors
None Provided
- Blincoe, K., Sheoran, J., Goggins, S., Petakovic, E., & Damian, D. (2016). Understanding the popular users: Following, affiliation influence and leadership on GitHub. Information and Software Technology, 70, 30–39.
- Canfora, G., Di Penta, M., Oliveto, R., & Panichella, S. (2012). Who is Going to Mentor Newcomers in Open Source Projects? Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 44:1-44:11. https://doi.org/10.1145/2393596.2393647
- Padala, H. S., Mendez, C., Fronchetti, F., Steinmacher, I., Steine-Hanson, Z., Hilderbrand, C., Horvath, A., Hill, C., Simpson, L., Burnett, M., Gerosa, M., & Sarma, A. (2022). How Gender-Biased Tools Shape Newcomer Experiences in OSS Projects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.2984173
- Steinmacher, I., Graciotto Silva, M. A., Gerosa, M. A., & Redmiles, D. F. (2015). A systematic literature review on the barriers faced by newcomers to open source software projects. Information and Software Technology, 59, 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.11.001
- Steinmacher, I., Wiese, I. S., Conte, T., Gerosa, M. A., & Redmiles, D. (2014). The Hard Life of Open Source Software Project Newcomers. Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593702.2593704
- Anita Ihuman
- Matt Germonprez
- Sean Goggins
- Ruth Ikegah
- Katie Schueths
- Amy Marrich
- Kristi Progri
- Elizabeth Barron
- Dawn Foster
- Kevin Lumbard
- Yigakpoa L. Samuel
To edit this metric, please submit a Change Request here.
To reference this metric in software or publications, please use this stable URL: https://chaoss.community/?p=4891