Skip to content

Conversation

@markusthoemmes
Copy link
Contributor

There's nothing inherently wrong with the existing implementation other than that I found it to be unnecessarily complex to read. This reworks it into a generic coalescingCache, which seems to be applicable to the etags cache as-is as well.

@markusthoemmes markusthoemmes force-pushed the cache-transport-rework branch from 7ef2196 to 224ea71 Compare August 19, 2025 16:21
There's nothing inherently wrong with the existing implementation other than that I found it to be unnecessarily complex to read. This reworks it into a generic `coalescingCache`, which seems to be applicable to the etags cache as-is as well.
@markusthoemmes markusthoemmes force-pushed the cache-transport-rework branch from 224ea71 to 04acab3 Compare August 19, 2025 16:25
@markusthoemmes markusthoemmes marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2025 16:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant