Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

After loading (cemerick.austin.repls/exec), austin fails with "No value supplied for key:" #75

Open
rterbush opened this issue Apr 1, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@rterbush
Copy link

rterbush commented Apr 1, 2015

Found the magic to get austin, piggieback and cljs to compile, but when running (cemeric.austin.repls/exec) it fails with the following error in the repl.

Please let me know what I can do to help track this down.

IllegalArgumentException No value supplied for key: cemerick.austin.DelegatingExecEnv@4fd7d1f4  clojure.lang.PersistentHashMap.create (PersistentHashMap.java:77)
@cemerick
Copy link
Owner

cemerick commented Apr 1, 2015

The problem is that Austin has not yet been updated to work with the latest piggieback. Coming soon.

jumarko added a commit to jumarko/austin that referenced this issue May 11, 2017
There was an issue when trying to start browser-connected repl:
 [{:type java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
   :message "No value supplied for key: cemerick.austin.DelegatingExecEnv@1d1e650e"
   :at [clojure.lang.PersistentHashMap create "PersistentHashMap.java" 77]}]
 :trace
 [[clojure.lang.PersistentHashMap create "PersistentHashMap.java" 77]
  [cemerick.piggieback$cljs_repl invokeStatic "piggieback.clj" 212]
  [cemerick.piggieback$cljs_repl doInvoke "piggieback.clj" 212]
  [clojure.lang.RestFn applyTo "RestFn.java" 139]
  [clojure.core$apply invokeStatic "core.clj" 650]
  [clojure.core$apply invoke "core.clj" 641]
  [cemerick.austin.repls$cljs_repl invokeStatic "repls.clj" 49]
  [cemerick.austin.repls$cljs_repl doInvoke "repls.clj" 43]

See cemerick#75.
@jumarko
Copy link

jumarko commented May 11, 2017

Not sure if this is the whole story, but that particular point can be solved by simple fix: jumarko@2302a3e#diff-7f3a30706a736e2d43f5b9174d97c73eL49

@cemerick
Copy link
Owner

I'll apply a PR if you send it.

FWIW, I use figwheel exclusively at this point, which is why I've not addressed this myself already.

@jumarko
Copy link

jumarko commented May 12, 2017

I've created the pull request: #77
Yes, it definitely makes sense to use figwheel nowadays for most of the work.
I was just playing with different alternatives :).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants