-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Precertificate is a capitalized term across the TLS BR document but it is not a defined term #564
Comments
This issue was created based on:
|
Do we want to take the first sentence from section 7.1.2.9 for this, and add the poison extension bit to it?? Precertificate: A Precertificate is a signed data structure that can be submitted to a Certificate Transparency log, as defined by RFC 6962 and containing a critical poison extension (OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.11129.2.4.3). |
I like it.
Thanks
Marco S.
TrustID Program Manager
From: Martijn Katerbarg ***@***.***>
Sent: Friday, December 6, 2024 8:57 AM
To: cabforum/servercert ***@***.***>
Cc: Marco Schambach ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: [External]Re: [cabforum/servercert] Precertificate is a capitalized term across the TLS BR document but it is not a defined term (Issue #564)
Do we want to take the first sentence from section 7.1.2.9 for this, and add the poison extension bit to it??
Precertificate: A Precertificate is a signed data structure that can be submitted to a Certificate Transparency log, as defined by RFC 6962 <https://tools.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6962> and containing a critical poison extension (OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.11129.2.4.3).
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#564 (comment)> , or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIQ6DCOYCHU35T5LWPXWCKD2EGUMBAVCNFSM6AAAAABTAWQK5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKMRTGMYDQOJSGM> .
You are receiving this because you were mentioned. <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AIQ6DCMGOPKE6DTEHXOO47L2EGUMBA5CNFSM6AAAAABTAWQK5KWGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTUWM2RXW.gif> Message ID: ***@***.*** ***@***.***> >
|
Perhaps a nit, but I would change "a" to "the" in "a critical poison extension" so it's abundantly clear there is only one extension type that qualifies as the poison extension:
|
Originally posted by @mschambach in #563 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: