Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phone Contact with Domain Contact -- Is it allowed, or is it not? #547

Open
aaomidi opened this issue Sep 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Phone Contact with Domain Contact -- Is it allowed, or is it not? #547

aaomidi opened this issue Sep 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
baseline-requirements Server Certificate CWG - Baseline Requirements clean-up Items for future clean-up ballot

Comments

@aaomidi
Copy link

aaomidi commented Sep 14, 2024

https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/blob/ba28d04894d69c8fac62850b9d0de5061658c7c5/docs/BR.md#32243-phone-contact-with-domain-contact

vs

https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/blob/ba28d04894d69c8fac62850b9d0de5061658c7c5/docs/BR.md#322415-phone-contact-with-domain-contact

What's the difference between these two? Can they use a different title to remove the ambiguity if they are meant to be different? A strict reading of the BRs would prevent the use of 3.2.2.4.15 because a method with that exact name is banned under 3.2.2.4.3

Copy link

This issue was created based on:

  • TLS BR Version 2.0.7
  • EVG Version 2.0.1

@dzacharo
Copy link
Contributor

This should be fixed in a cleanup ballot adding "v2" in the title of method 3.2.2.4.15.

@dzacharo dzacharo added baseline-requirements Server Certificate CWG - Baseline Requirements clean-up Items for future clean-up ballot labels Jan 13, 2025
@dzacharo
Copy link
Contributor

Notes from SCWG Teleconference 2025-01-16.
This method shall be prohibited just like 3.2.2.4.3.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
baseline-requirements Server Certificate CWG - Baseline Requirements clean-up Items for future clean-up ballot
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants