Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standardize on date format for date of incorporation or registration #193

Open
clintwilson opened this issue Jun 12, 2020 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
ev-guidelines Server Certificate CWG - Extended Validation Guidelines

Comments

@clintwilson
Copy link
Member

@timfromdigicert identified a useful improvement to the EV Guidelines:

The following text is current in the EV Guidelines, section 9.2.5:
“If the Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration does not provide a Registration Number, then the date of Incorporation or Registration SHALL be entered into this field in any one of the common date formats.”
Is there any reason why we shouldn’t standardize on an ISO 8601 date format like YYYY-MM-DD?
Obviously, this would require time to implement for CAs that might be using alternative formats, but I’m not sure what the value is of allowing flexibility in this particular field.

@sleevi agreed this would useful to align on. I echo that agreement as well; we should identify a well-specified date format compatible with the goals here (e.g. it's rare for incorporation dates to be more granular that Day+Month+Year).

Using ISO 8601's Complete Date format as Tim described seems like a good starting point (YYYY-MM-DD (e.g. 2020-01-23).

@sleevi sleevi added ev-guidelines Server Certificate CWG - Extended Validation Guidelines servercert-wg labels Jun 18, 2020
@barrini
Copy link
Contributor

barrini commented Apr 25, 2024

still ongoing and perfect for an easy ballot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ev-guidelines Server Certificate CWG - Extended Validation Guidelines
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants