Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve workflow for reviewing curation results #133

Open
nawatts opened this issue Jul 31, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Improve workflow for reviewing curation results #133

nawatts opened this issue Jul 31, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@nawatts
Copy link
Contributor

nawatts commented Jul 31, 2019

Frequently, projects have a second round of curation where results from multiple curators are reconciled and finalized. However, since the result database records are tied to assignments and assignments must be unique for a curator/variant within a project, there is no way for a curator to go back and add a "final" result without overwriting their original result.

A workaround is to copy variants and results into a new project and modify the results there. However, this requires duplicating variants and associated records (annotations, tags, samples).

Thus, we should add the concept of multiple "rounds" of curation into the application. A project would have one or more rounds and a curator could be assigned the same variant in each round. Instead of assignment records being unique for a project/curator/variant, they would be unique for project/curator/variant/round. Results for each round could also be downloaded separately. The overall project results would contain results grouped by curator/variant, with only the result for the most recent round in which that curator/variant was assigned.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant