We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For example a file at src/_pages/features/security.multi.erb will return the following for these Resource methods:
src/_pages/features/security.multi.erb
Resource
#relative_path_basename_without_prefix
"features/cards.multi"
#relative_path
"_pages/features/cards.multi.erb"
Would it make more sense if relative_path_basename_without_prefix returned "features/cards" in this case?
relative_path_basename_without_prefix
"features/cards"
I can open a PR to fix it, if you think this is a bug. If it isn't, I'm also fine with current behavior. Just wanted to ask.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
For example a file at
src/_pages/features/security.multi.erb
will return the following for theseResource
methods:#relative_path_basename_without_prefix
=>"features/cards.multi"
#relative_path
=>"_pages/features/cards.multi.erb"
Would it make more sense if
relative_path_basename_without_prefix
returned"features/cards"
in this case?I can open a PR to fix it, if you think this is a bug. If it isn't, I'm also fine with current behavior. Just wanted to ask.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: