Skip to content

Conversation

ZerryNi
Copy link
Contributor

@ZerryNi ZerryNi commented Oct 10, 2025

Test passed!
image

@ZerryNi
Copy link
Contributor Author

ZerryNi commented Oct 14, 2025

@BiocondaBot please add label.

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added the please review & merge set to ask for merge label Oct 14, 2025
Copy link
Member

@daler daler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you explain the details of these changes, why they are needed, and how we can be sure the package is not broken because of them?

data = f.read()


result = model.predict([[1.0]])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the goal of this function? Why would it throw away all data and just predict on [[1.0]]?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi.Because the original depengdency on snns was too old and couldn't be adapted to the linux-aarch64 platform,we switched to TensorFlow and modified the test statements for a simple test.All my PR modifications were made to adapt the software to the Linux-aarch64 platform.Thank you for helping me with the problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

please review & merge set to ask for merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants