You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, string vs. number input fields are formatted differently (see example below).
Note that "." within values for North Axis and convergence tolerance values are also formatted the same as numbers on either side of it.
If the number input field has an entry that starts with ".", then it is unformatted (like the "," and ";" separating input fields). See example below after switching "0.5" to ".5" in the convergence tolerance values.
EnergyPlus still reads this correctly and finishes a simulation, so it's just a small formatting issue when viewing the IDF.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, string vs. number input fields are formatted differently (see example below).
Note that "." within values for North Axis and convergence tolerance values are also formatted the same as numbers on either side of it.
If the number input field has an entry that starts with ".", then it is unformatted (like the "," and ";" separating input fields). See example below after switching "0.5" to ".5" in the convergence tolerance values.
EnergyPlus still reads this correctly and finishes a simulation, so it's just a small formatting issue when viewing the IDF.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: