Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.

Use cmd-P instead of cmd-shift-P #55

Closed
adius opened this issue Aug 8, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Use cmd-P instead of cmd-shift-P #55

adius opened this issue Aug 8, 2015 · 7 comments
Labels

Comments

@adius
Copy link

adius commented Aug 8, 2015

As already proposed in fuzzy-finder atom/fuzzy-finder#129 I think we should not use the duplicate shortcut cmd-P for the fuzzy-finder but instead use it to toggle the command-palette.
As it is "probably the most important command in Atom" (as stated in the flight manual) and should therefore better be assigned to a 2 key instead of a 3 key shortcut.

@adius
Copy link
Author

adius commented Oct 11, 2015

No thoughts on this one?

@thomasjo
Copy link

If we change this, I don't think we can change it until Atom v2.0.0 since this would constitute a "breaking" change. /cc @atom/feedback

@lee-dohm
Copy link
Contributor

I agree with @thomasjo, if this is done it should be done for v2.0.

@slavaGanzin
Copy link

Don't you try bind it by yourself and forget about a "problem"?
I'm using alt-space, it's my choice and I didn't want to dictate it to someone

@vviikk
Copy link

vviikk commented May 12, 2016

NO way. Why change something that works? I use CMD+P for files, which is what any programmer needs more than the actual command palette. Bind your own shortcuts mate.

@jdamgo
Copy link

jdamgo commented Feb 6, 2017

Keybinding is something that is (more or less) unique to every programmer. Everybody has preferences and reluctances. That's why it's something most editors can fully customize. In atom it's pretty easy as well (short notice: use unset! as command to remove a binding). Besides that making sure there are no duplicates can be challanging and if it currently works - customize it locally to your likings.

@lee-dohm
Copy link
Contributor

lee-dohm commented Feb 6, 2017

We're not looking at updating keybindings default keybindings except in extreme circumstances at this point.

Thanks for the feedback!

@lee-dohm lee-dohm closed this as completed Feb 6, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants