You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the NZ ABM, we are looking to build a regional benchmark to compare the mode shares within each region. This BM makes use of the destination_mode_shares_comparison BM with the groupby_person_attributes parameter to group the mode shares by region.
The output of the current implementation of the handler/ BM sums the mode shares for all classes to 1, however, for our particular instance, we would like to alter it so that the mode shares sum to 1 per region (class) to allow for the comparisons regionally.
From what I understand, there seems to be two ways to implement this case, with the first being to implement it as a separate NZ-specific BM in the benchmarking.py and the other to implement it as a more general case - perhaps involving a boolean parameter or a separate handler class to enable this option. I was wondering which would be the more suitable option of implementation in the best interest of Elara?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For the NZ ABM, we are looking to build a regional benchmark to compare the mode shares within each region. This BM makes use of the
destination_mode_shares_comparison
BM with thegroupby_person_attributes
parameter to group the mode shares by region.The output of the current implementation of the handler/ BM sums the mode shares for all classes to 1, however, for our particular instance, we would like to alter it so that the mode shares sum to 1 per region (class) to allow for the comparisons regionally.
From what I understand, there seems to be two ways to implement this case, with the first being to implement it as a separate NZ-specific BM in the benchmarking.py and the other to implement it as a more general case - perhaps involving a boolean parameter or a separate handler class to enable this option. I was wondering which would be the more suitable option of implementation in the best interest of Elara?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: