You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I understand the motivation behind the license change and that arcee ai needs to keep development sustainable, but I still want to raise some concerns I have that would keep me from making contributions to this project in the future:
I would like there to be an explicit date set for when the License is changed back again to LGPL for clarity, in its current form the BSL only mentions two years from the date the Licensed Work is published, but mergekit was never published under the BSL, only the LGPL with the license changing now. One can assume two years after this license change. But I'd still like there to be an explicit date which is better enforceable.
I don't like subsection 2.3 in the Contributor License Agreement:
3.3 Moral Rights
To the fullest extent permitted by law, You hereby waive, and agree not to assert, all of Your "moral rights" in or relating to Your Contributions for the benefit of Arcee, its assigns, and their respective direct and indirect sublicensees.
I don't think it's necessary and I don't think it is moral, naturally.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I understand the motivation behind the license change and that arcee ai needs to keep development sustainable, but I still want to raise some concerns I have that would keep me from making contributions to this project in the future:
I would like there to be an explicit date set for when the License is changed back again to LGPL for clarity, in its current form the BSL only mentions two years from the date the Licensed Work is published, but mergekit was never published under the BSL, only the LGPL with the license changing now. One can assume two years after this license change. But I'd still like there to be an explicit date which is better enforceable.
I don't like subsection 2.3 in the Contributor License Agreement:
I don't think it's necessary and I don't think it is moral, naturally.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions