You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Fig 2. style_mask generated by "scatter_to_mask_perregion" function
My question is, I found that the released code uses "scatter_to_mask", but the picture of "style-mixing" in the paper is not a 0-1 binary mask. So could you please tell me which function should I use? Thank you very much!
I guess you use scatter_to_mask because it has better training results, while scatter_to_mask_perregion is used for visualization. haha.
Fig 3. "style mixing"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hi, I have some questions about "region-wise distance map P"
If we use the "scatter_to_mask" function to generate style_mask, the region-wise distance map can only be 0 or 1
style_mask = scatter_to_mask(condition_img.clone(), labels)
Fig 1. style_mask generated by "scatter_to_mask" function
If we use "scatter_to_mask_perregion" function to generate style_mask, the region-wise distance map can be a float in [0,1]
style_mask = scatter_to_mask_perregion(condition_img.clone(), labels)
Fig 2. style_mask generated by "scatter_to_mask_perregion" function
My question is, I found that the released code uses "scatter_to_mask", but the picture of "style-mixing" in the paper is not a 0-1 binary mask. So could you please tell me which function should I use? Thank you very much!
I guess you use scatter_to_mask because it has better training results, while scatter_to_mask_perregion is used for visualization. haha.
Fig 3. "style mixing"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: