Skip to content

Implement rolling manifest-writers #596

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Fokko opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Implement rolling manifest-writers #596

Fokko opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@Fokko
Copy link
Contributor

Fokko commented Apr 10, 2024

Feature Request / Improvement

Once we get support for merge-append #363 operations, and also compaction in the future, it would be good to have rolling-manifest writers that open a new file once the manifest gets to a certain size (both bytes and number of entries). This makes sure that Iceberg tables have decent parallelization when doing query planning.

@felixscherz
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, I would like to give this a shot if no one else is currently working on this:)
I see the java implementation has a RollingManifestWriter so I'd start there.

Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open for 180 days with no activity. It will be closed in next 14 days if no further activity occurs. To permanently prevent this issue from being considered stale, add the label 'not-stale', but commenting on the issue is preferred when possible.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Oct 12, 2024
Copy link

This issue has been closed because it has not received any activity in the last 14 days since being marked as 'stale'

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 26, 2024
@kevinjqliu kevinjqliu reopened this Mar 26, 2025
@kevinjqliu kevinjqliu removed the stale label Mar 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants