You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using the abj model (e.g. Dreissena polymorpha), and I calculated parameters based on experiments (instead of using the covariation method).
I directly specified zoom factor z = maximum physical length being observed * shape coefficient (del_M) calculated based on the adult length and weight relation. However, I later realized that this gives me incorrect ultimate length (Lw_i) under standard condition (f = 1, temperature = 20 dC).
I found out that, because for the prediction for an abj organism,
I am using the abj model (e.g. Dreissena polymorpha), and I calculated parameters based on experiments (instead of using the covariation method).
I directly specified zoom factor z = maximum physical length being observed * shape coefficient (del_M) calculated based on the adult length and weight relation. However, I later realized that this gives me incorrect ultimate length (Lw_i) under standard condition (f = 1, temperature = 20 dC).
I found out that, because for the prediction for an abj organism,
l_i = l_j / l_b is used to scale ultimate L_m to L_i, which it is not 1.
Then should the zoom factor, as a core parameter, be scaled too?
z = Lw_b / Lw_j * Lw_i * del_M
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: