How to Optimize Cross-Platform Async Downloading Performance in Ghost-Downloader-3? #174
Replies: 1 comment
-
Optimizing async downloading performance across Linux, Windows, and macOS in a Python app like Ghost-Downloader-3 involves addressing platform-specific nuances while making the best use of Python’s async and threading capabilities. Here are some tips and best practices: Choose the Right Event Loop for Each Platform: On Windows, asyncio defaults to SelectorEventLoop, which can have limitations. Consider using ProactorEventLoop on Windows for better performance with async I/O. On Unix-based systems (Linux/macOS), SelectorEventLoop or UVLoop (a fast third-party alternative) can provide better throughput. Use Efficient HTTP Libraries: Intelligent Chunking and Concurrent Connections: Thread Pool vs Async IO: Cross-Platform File I/O: Monitor Resource Usage: Platform-Specific Optimizations: On Windows, take advantage of IOCP (I/O Completion Ports) through ProactorEventLoop for scalable async I/O. On Linux, consider tweaking TCP window sizes and socket options if your app controls networking at a low level. On macOS, test thoroughly on different OS versions as async behavior can vary. Testing Under Real-World Conditions: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Ghost-Downloader-3 supports Linux, Windows, and macOS with async multithreading for fast downloads. I’m currently trying to optimize the downloader’s performance across these platforms, especially handling differences in network stack behavior, asyncio event loop implementations, and thread management.
What techniques or best practices have you found effective to maintain consistent high-speed downloads and minimize resource usage in a cross-platform Python downloader? Any advice on tuning asyncio or thread pools for this kind of app would be appreciated!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions