Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider adding support for velopack #771

Open
GeertvanHorrik opened this issue Feb 25, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Consider adding support for velopack #771

GeertvanHorrik opened this issue Feb 25, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@GeertvanHorrik
Copy link
Member

Squirrel seems no longer to be actively maintained. An alternative (with a decent upgrade path) is Velopack.

We need to investigate the package and it's possibilities.

The idea is not to rename this package, but add support (and an automatic upgrade path) to velopack instead.

@caesay
Copy link

caesay commented Feb 25, 2025

It looks like this library (from the readme) was to add extra features like channels: note that Velopack already supports channels natively.

@GeertvanHorrik
Copy link
Member Author

I read about the channels, but we need a way to auto-detect what tech to use for backwards compatibility. I will check if we can keep using it as-is or whether we need to migrate our current approach.

@caesay
Copy link

caesay commented Feb 25, 2025

Looks like you could pretty easily write an IUpdateService which wraps Velopack's UpdateManager so you can swap your backend out. Note that Velopack supports migrating apps from Squirrel automatically (but back not the other way)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants