Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the results are not as expected. #45

Open
goldtimes opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

the results are not as expected. #45

goldtimes opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 5 comments

Comments

@goldtimes
Copy link

in the bash
python run_slam.py configs/TUM_RGBD/rgbd_dataset_freiburg1_desk.yaml --input_path /media/kilox/PS2000/photo_slam_data/data/TUM/rgbd_dataset_freiburg1_desk --output_path output/TUM/desk

Image

@VladimirYugay
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for your interest in our work!

Can you please report the ATE and PSNR obtained on this sequence?

@goldtimes
Copy link
Author

here is ATE.json and PSNR
{"compared_pose_pairs": 592, "rmse": 0.062046918602192254, "mean": 0.05791550874710083, "median": 0.05207182094454765, "std": 0.022262418642640114, "min": 0.0, "max": 0.0988922268152237}

Image

@VladimirYugay
Copy link
Owner

VladimirYugay commented Jan 21, 2025

ATE seems normal (we report ATE aligned). What is the average PSNR and depth l1?

@goldtimes
Copy link
Author

do you mean rendering_metrics.json file?
here it's contents
{"psnr": 24.996692822847752, "lpips": 0.14584543960804194, "ssim": 0.9370739935450472, "depth_l1_train_view": 0.18504035514142356, "num_renders": 519}

@VladimirYugay
Copy link
Owner

Yes. I think the results reported in Table 2 accurately match your results. So I'd say that's the expected result you got!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants