You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the tiling methodology only make it possible to create a "flat" tree, using the position of each feature.
We may want to make it possible to create more depth (independently from the creation of LOD).
For example, we may want to put all biggest building in a tile, that would be loaded first.
Or, in the same boudning box, split features depending on their geometry resolution, or number of triangle, so that the most complex object are loaded last.
It would also be usefull to associate a Geometric Error parameter automatically using the size of a tile (and/or its features)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the tiling methodology only make it possible to create a "flat" tree, using the position of each feature.
We may want to make it possible to create more depth (independently from the creation of LOD).
For example, we may want to put all biggest building in a tile, that would be loaded first.
Or, in the same boudning box, split features depending on their geometry resolution, or number of triangle, so that the most complex object are loaded last.
It would also be usefull to associate a Geometric Error parameter automatically using the size of a tile (and/or its features)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: