You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's a new ExtPos feature on fixed expressions which triggers a whole bunch of validator warnings. There are also some actual errors now that it is expected that fixed expressions have this marked on them to account for unexpected POS for a particular dependency type. such as, for example, gets annotated as follows now in GUM:
31 such such ADJ JJ ExtPos=ADP 37 case 37:case _
32 as as ADP IN _ 31 fixed 31:fixed _
33 web web NOUN NN Number=Sing 35 compound 35:compound Entity=(83-abstract-new-cf6-5-sgl|SpaceAfter=No|XML=<w>
34 - - PUNCT HYPH _ 33 punct 33:punct SpaceAfter=No
35 based base VERB VBN Tense=Past|VerbForm=Part|Voice=Pass 37 amod 37:amod MSeg=bas-ed|XML=</w>
36 faculty faculty NOUN NN Number=Sing 37 compound 37:compound Entity=(84-person-new-cf8-1-sgl)
37 directories directory NOUN NNS Number=Plur 29 nmod 29:nmod:such_as MSeg=directorie-s
Basically if a fixed expression attaches as case, it should be ExtPos=ADP; if it attaches as mark, ExtPos=SCONJ; if it attaches as cc, ExtPos=CCONJ; and so on.
There's a new ExtPos feature on fixed expressions which triggers a whole bunch of validator warnings. There are also some actual errors now that it is expected that fixed expressions have this marked on them to account for unexpected POS for a particular dependency type.
such as
, for example, gets annotated as follows now in GUM:Is this a feature we can work on integrating into ParTUT? @nschneid @amir-zeldes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: