This repository should feel useful, direct, and safe for contributors and readers. We expect collaboration that improves the catalog without turning it into a hostile or noisy space.
- Be respectful, specific, and evidence-based when proposing changes.
- Keep critique focused on the content, workflow, or decision rather than the person.
- Share context that helps maintainers review quickly, such as affected files, examples, or operator impact.
- Assume a public audience and write as if someone else will need to run the workflow later.
- Harassment, threats, discrimination, or personal attacks.
- Publishing private data, credentials, customer details, or other sensitive information.
- Spam, repeated self-promotion, or off-topic solicitation.
- Knowingly suggesting unsafe workflows without calling out the risk and guardrails.
- Doxxing, impersonation, or other abusive platform behavior.
This code of conduct applies to issues, pull requests, discussions, reviews, and other repository-linked community spaces.
Maintainers may edit, hide, lock, or remove contributions that do not meet these expectations. They may also ask for revisions, pause a thread, or block repeat offenders when needed to keep the repository usable.
If you experience or witness behavior that violates this code of conduct, contact the maintainers privately through GitHub if possible. If private contact is not available, open a minimal issue asking for maintainer follow-up without posting sensitive details. For platform-level abuse, also report through GitHub Support.
Maintainers will review reports as promptly as practical and choose a response based on severity, pattern, and risk to participants. Possible actions include requesting edits, removing content, temporarily limiting participation, or permanently banning a contributor from repository spaces.