You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not a lawyer, but from my observation, the author can hold a copyright on material licensed in an open source project and what matters is the license of the project for example https://github.com/ansible/ansible/tree/devel/licenses
Ok, but why style it like the official website when it is not the official website? Why not just use your own styling or write your documentation in the absence of the official documentation? It seems like an odd thing to do. Somebody in a rush (overlooking the domain) may misinterpret it as the official documentation website.
The documentation for these modules is here (note RedHat 2019 Copyright notice at bottom):
https://terryhowe.github.io/ansible-modules-hashivault/modules/list_of_hashivault_modules.html
which is styled like and copies content from the official Ansible documentation. For example:
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/collections/community/hashi_vault/index.html
Isn't it illegal to copy content that has a copyright on it? Why was this done?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: