Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LDAPS ? #58

Open
RayDeanTech opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

LDAPS ? #58

RayDeanTech opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@RayDeanTech
Copy link

I've noticed recently that authenticating can take a super-long time. It's pretty bad right now.

We believe our IT department has changed something; specifically, we may be required to use LDAPS moving forward. Can this module support LDAPS?

Is there a way to point to a specific domain controller if needed?

Is there a way to troubleshoot why this module is "acting slowly"?

I don't expect an answer, but if you can point me in a direction, I can continue researching.

Thank you.

@YvesR
Copy link

YvesR commented Jan 26, 2022

LDAPs works fine with this plugin, we use this in our projects, too.
Did you try set a specific DC using NTLMDefaultDomain ?

My personal experience in large domains is also, that the DNS settings leads to the wrong DC to ask.

@RayDeanTech
Copy link
Author

RayDeanTech commented Jan 26, 2022

@YvesR thank you....

Right now, NTLMDefaultDomain is not specified, but NTLMDomain is equal to our domain name.

I made an assumption that we would need to change something.

IT is going to turn off LDAP, and we must use LDAPS. They've provided an endpoint... example: ldap://serverpool.domain.net:123. So, my guess is port 389 will not function anymore.

@YvesR
Copy link

YvesR commented Jan 27, 2022

Our admin approved that we can use this against LDAPs without issues. So if this takes longer time, this might be a network and/or DNS problem? Check with your admins if they can trace the requests and compare with apache logs.

@JBlond
Copy link
Contributor

JBlond commented Jan 28, 2022

AFAIK the port is 636 with TLS, not 389. Is that port open?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants